7 comments

  • jhogervorst 1 hour ago
    According to some people on X, they shut down immediately, while rides were still active. Sounds like an unplanned (and quite crazy) action.

    https://x.com/gergelyorosz/status/2095256757178188113

    • embedding-shape 53 minutes ago
      Given Uber is one of the few companies who are lucky enough to have a separate page for all the controversies on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Uber), they also have their own fair of experience with police raids on their offices. They've also used "‘kill switch’ during raids to stop police seeing data" (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/jul/10/uber-files-leak...) before, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was some sort of legal "kill switch" or whatever that got triggered, so they can get rid of everything faster.
      • bossyTeacher 9 minutes ago
        > They've also used "‘kill switch’ during raids to stop police seeing data

        If Uber wasn't a VC backed company, they would have been charged with destruction of evidence or similar.

    • 1970-01-01 48 minutes ago
      This is hilarious. They are legally kidnappers at this point. No reason to even stop the ride and let you get out for free.
  • tristanj 52 minutes ago
    Makes sense, Uber's 30-50% cut is far too much. How can they compete with inDrive which only takes 10%. And on inDrive you set your own fare.

    Rides are 20-40% cheaper elsewhere, why would anyone pay extra for Uber?

    • Loughla 40 minutes ago
      I would pay extra because I don't want the cognitive load of haggling on the cost. When I want/need A ride, it's because I'm either overloaded, away from home, or drunk. These are three times that I didn't want to bother with any more nonsense.
      • samrus 15 minutes ago
        Its not that much. And you can just bypass it by accepting the first offer you get
      • bdangubic 5 minutes ago
        haggling when drunk is super fun
        • mythrwy 1 minute ago
          but haggling with drunks is not
    • blovescoffee 42 minutes ago
      One anecdote for a datapoint: Not sure if it's better now but I've lost a phone in an InDrive and I've lost an expensive bag in an Uber and it was significantly easier and less sketchy to get the bag back. I'm not a price sensitive rider so the insurance of a reputable 'comfort' tier Uber driver paid off. The InDrive driver made me get another ride to him then demanded $1000mxn (~$55usd) to return my phone. The Uber app had me pay ~$250mxn if I remember correctly and the driver promptly returned the bag.
    • 486sx33 49 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • alephnerd 1 hour ago
    Bolt (the CEE ridesharing app) is the primary player in Nigeria. In Uganda it's primarily a bunch of local startups.
  • hduto 49 minutes ago
    Driving for Uber in Lagos I suspect has to be very challenging
  • swimminglala88 55 minutes ago
    why they do that
    • tristanj 46 minutes ago
      In developing countries, the taxi market is largely unregulated and Uber faces actual competition. Uber cannot compete on price in these regions.
      • aleksandrm 0 minutes ago
        In other words Uber did not bribe the politicians enough in their favor, market was not favorable for them, so they exited.
      • wolvoleo 32 minutes ago
        Even in countries where taxis are regulated, sometimes Uber is more expensive but safer. Like in Romania. When I used to go there a lot the official taxis were mandated to offer such low standardized rates that there was a lot of scamming going on. One of my colleagues was basically abducted by a taxi driver (taken to a dangerous gypsy area and told they would kick him out of the car unless he paid them hundreds of euro). Uber was a lot safer because you have tracability on the driver, but more expensive too. And there weren't a lot of them.

        There were ways to get safe drivers in some cases by booking them through the yellow machines. But in the end the company hired private drivers for us. Though personally I would just use the metro and tram a lot too :P If you know where you're going it's not a dangerous place.

        Not sure if the taxi situation is still as bad there by the way. I would hope not.

      • chermi 8 minutes ago
        Does no one have any memory of what taxis were like and how much they cost? The taxis are gone because they weren't competitive.
        • bdangubic 0 minutes ago
          taxis “weren’t competitive” when Uber rides were heavily subsidized and Uber was burning billions. I ride taxi now exclusively because it is almost always cheaper than Uber
      • ttoinou 37 minutes ago
        Counterpoint : in Portugal they are regulated under TVDE, and Uber is competitive with Bolt
      • PunchyHamster 38 minutes ago
        their only leg up in 1st world countries was largely going around any laws governing taxis
        • tristanj 6 minutes ago
          I disagree, that was only true 15 years ago. In developed countries, ride hailing is highly regulated. Uber is one of the few companies willing to implement all the required regulations.
  • harkenugent 14 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • EGreg 1 hour ago
    [flagged]